Skip to Main Content

Biology: Predatory publishers and science misinformation

Reading list

Predatory data

The Surgisphere scandal during COVID-19

Baker, N. et al. (2020) Coronapod: The Surgisphere scandal that rocked coronavirus drug research. Nature (London). [Online]

Piller, C. (2020) Who’s to blame? These three scientists are at the heart of the Surgisphere COVID-19 scandal. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science). [Online]

Predatory publishers in science: overview

All of the following articles are peer-reviewed, open-access and available through the University of Waterloo Library

Predatory publishing and COVID-19

  1. Capodici, A. et al. (2023) Biased, wrong and counterfeited evidences published during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review of retracted COVID-19 papers. Quality & quantity. [Online] 57 (5), 4881–4913.
  2. Else, H. (2020) How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing - in seven charts. Nature (London). [Online] 588 (7839), 553–553.
  3. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2020) An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues. The Journal of academic librarianship. [Online] 46 (5), 102187–102187.
  4. Vervoort, D. et al. (2020) Money down the drain: predatory publishing in the COVID-19 era. Canadian journal of public health. [Online] 111 (5), 665–666.